News

Bellona’s Comment on the Military Drone Strike at Chernobyl reactor shield

The shield of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant after it was hit by a drone. Photo: IAEA
The shield of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant after it was hit by a drone. Photo: IAEA

Publish date: 14/02/2025

Written by: Bellona

Last night, a military drone crashed into the protective shell of the New Safe Confinement (NSC), which was erected in 2016 over the old sarcophagus covering the destroyed fourth reactor unit of the Chernobyl NPP

A military drone with a high-explosive warhead struck the former Chernobyl nuclear power plant in Ukraine overnight, damaging a protective shelter that prevents radiation leaks at the plant’s destroyed fourth reactor unit, President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine said on Friday.

In a post on social media, Zelensky called the damage “significant” but said that there were no signs of increased radiation at the plant, the site of the worst nuclear accident in history. Denys Shmyhal, the Ukrainian prime minister, said Friday morning that emergency crews had extinguished a fire at the site. A Kremlin spokesman denied that Russia had attacked the plant.

The structure that was damaged — called the New Safe Confinement — was installed with EU to seal in vast quantities of radioactive isotopes from the fire and meltdown in 1986 at Chernobyl’s Reactor No. 4, and was intended to last generations. The enormous dome — which is the world’s largest movable land-based structure — was installed in 2016 to augment the ad-hoc cement sarcophagus installed by the disaster’s original liquidators, and which began to fail in 2005.

According to inspectors from the IAEA mission on-site, there are no signs of internal structural damage, and radiation levels inside and outside the structure remain normal. No casualties have been reported.

“A drone or missile strike on the new protective shell could potentially damage or collapse the structures of the old sarcophagus inside,” Dmitry Gorchakov, a nuclear advisor at Bellona Environmental Transparency Center, said.

The shield of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant after it was hit by a drone. Photo: State Emergency Service of Ukraine
The engine of the drone hit the Chernobyl NPP. Photo: State Emergency Service of Ukraine

The new 108-meter-high structure, resembling an enormous airplane hangar and built to last 100 years, is the main radiation shield protecting the Chernobyl personnel who are working to decommission the remains of No 4 reactor — which still includes enormous blobs of melted-down, highly radioactive uranium fuel mixed with cement and steel. It also encloses high-tech robotic devices that perform dismantlement tasks that are too dangerous for humans to undertake. 

“A potential full penetration of the new confinement and damage to the old sarcophagus could lead to the collapse of aging structures, the release of radioactive dust, and its dispersion beyond the protective shell through the resulting breach,” said Gorchakov.  “In this case, the drone pierced the outer cladding of the confinement, with its debris and engine — resembling the engine of a Shahed drone used by Russian forces—and lodged between the outer and inner layers of the New Safe Confinement without breaching the internal structure or damaging the old sarcophagus.”

Gorchakov’s appraisal was backed by reports from Ukrainian authorities. But the structure’s vulnerability to future attacks remains. It also remains unclear whether the structure was actually the target of the attack or was just collateral damage caused by an errant drone.

But Gorchakov warned that such an incident was only a matter of time given the Chernobyl site’s location below a flight path used for Russian attacks on Kyiv.

The shield of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant after it was hit by a drone. Photo: The engine of the drone. Photo: State Emergency Service of Ukraine

Bellona has repeatedly warned of the risks of shelling and drone strikes on Ukraine’s nuclear facilities. Alexander Nikitin, a nuclear advisor at Bellona, believes that this time, people in the potential contamination zone were lucky. “But luck may not last forever,” he concludes.